🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally avoided significant use of randomization during my D&D games. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be guided by character actions rather than random chance. That said, I chose to try something different, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

An influential streamed game utilizes a DM who frequently asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. The process entails choosing a specific dice and assigning possible results based on the result. While it's essentially no different from consulting a pre-generated chart, these get invented spontaneously when a character's decision lacks a obvious outcome.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, mainly because it seemed novel and provided a change from my usual habits. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the perennial balance between pre-determination and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Session Moment

At a session, my party had just emerged from a city-wide fight. When the dust settled, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. In place of choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a deeply emotional sequence where the adventurers discovered the bodies of their companions, still united in death. The group conducted a ceremony, which was especially meaningful due to prior roleplaying. As a final gesture, I improvised that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, revealing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group required to resolve another critical story problem. It's impossible to script these kinds of serendipitous story beats.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This experience made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the core of tabletop RPGs. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers reliably take delight in ignoring the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to adapt swiftly and create scenarios in the moment.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a fantastic way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for small-scale circumstances that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. As an example, I wouldn't use it to decide if the main villain is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to decide if the PCs enter a room just in time to see a critical event takes place.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps make players feel invested and create the feeling that the story is dynamic, progressing based on their actions immediately. It reduces the feeling that they are merely characters in a rigidly planned script, thereby strengthening the shared nature of the game.

This approach has long been part of the original design. Original D&D were reliant on encounter generators, which made sense for a game focused on dungeon crawling. Even though current D&D tends to prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the best approach.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

Absolutely no problem with being prepared. However, equally valid nothing wrong with relinquishing control and allowing the dice to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Authority is a significant part of a DM's role. We need it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to release it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

The core advice is this: Have no fear of temporarily losing control. Experiment with a little improvisation for inconsequential details. You might just find that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you could have planned in advance.